Actuarially Sound

An actuarially sound rate covers every cost a plan can reasonably expect, including claims, trend, fees and a margin for a bad year, without charging more than it needs to. It's a test of the assumptions behind a price, not a compliment.

Also calledactuarial soundnessactuarially sound rateactuarially sound premiumrate adequacyadequate rates
Updated October 21, 20264 min readWatch the 1:31 video

Why it matters

"Actuarially sound" sounds like praise. It's actually a test: does the rate cover the costs the plan can reasonably expect, on assumptions that hold up? A sound rate isn't too low, and it isn't padded either.

The test matters most when you're comparing quotes. Two quotes for the same plan can differ by $100,000 because one assumes less medical trend or leaves out a margin for a bad year. That doesn't make the plan cheaper to run. If claims come in as expected, the missing money has to come from somewhere, and the next renewal catches up.

Where the term comes from

There's no single legal definition for employer health plans. The formal uses are elsewhere:

  • Medicaid managed care. Federal rules at 42 CFR 438.4 require state Medicaid managed care rates to be actuarially sound and certified by an actuary. The actuarial standard for that work, ASOP 49, describes sound rates as ones that provide for all reasonable, appropriate and attainable costs.
  • State rate laws. Most states require insurance rates that are not excessive, inadequate or unfairly discriminatory. "Inadequate" means too low to cover expected costs. "Excessive" means more than needed. "Unfairly discriminatory" means charging similar risks differently without a cost-based reason.

The working idea carries over to any quote: enough to cover what you can reasonably expect, and no more than that.

Worked example: two quotes for the same plan

An illustrative 100-employee group with $1,000,000 in claims last year. Fees (admin and stop-loss) are held flat for simplicity.

PieceQuote AQuote B
Claims$1,000k$1,000k
Trend8%: $80k2%: $20k
Fees$120k$120k
Margin$40k$0
Quote$1,240k$1,140k

Quote B is $100,000 cheaper. All of the difference is assumptions: a lower trend and no margin. Claims, fees and the plan are the same.

What happens when claims run as expected

Claims grow 8%, to $1,080,000. With $120,000 in fees, the year costs $1,200,000.

Quote A
+$40,000
To spare
Quote B
−$60,000
Short

Next year's sound rate starts from the higher claims: $1,080,000 × 1.08 + $120,000 + $40,000 = $1,326,400.

Quote AQuote B
This year$1,240k$1,140k
Next year$1,326k$1,326k
Increase+7.0%+16.4%

Both groups end up at the same rate. The group that took Quote B saved $100,000 up front, came up $60,000 short, and then faces an increase more than twice as large. The +16.4% assumes nobody tries to recover the $60,000. If the insurer or stop-loss carrier does, it goes higher.

Read the transcript

Two quotes, same plan. One is a hundred thousand dollars cheaper. Only one is actuarially sound. Here's how to tell.

An actuarially sound rate covers every cost you can reasonably expect: claims, trend, fees and room for a bad year. Not less, and not more than it needs to be.

Take a hundred-employee group: a million in claims last year. Add eight percent trend, eighty thousand. A hundred twenty thousand in fees. Forty thousand for a bad year. One point two four million.

The cheaper quote assumes two percent trend and no room for a bad year. One point one four million.

Then claims rise eight percent, as expected. The cheap quote comes up sixty thousand short. Someone pays the gap, and the next renewal catches up: about sixteen percent instead of seven.

A sound quote shows its work: the trend, the data and the margin. And unlike Medicaid rates, it rarely comes with an actuary's sign-off. So the checking falls to you.

Ask your broker three things. What trend does this quote assume? Room for a bad year? Who pays if claims run over? If claims come in as expected, what's next year's increase? Find out more at actuariallysound dot com.

Who pays the gap

It depends on how the plan is funded.

  • Self-funded. The employer pays claims as they come in, so the employer covers the shortfall, up to its stop-loss limits.
  • Level-funded. Aggregate stop-loss usually covers claims above the fund this year. The carrier prices that loss into the renewal.
  • Fully insured. The insurer absorbs it this year. A group large enough to be rated on its own claims sees it at renewal.

Either way, an under-priced year doesn't disappear. It moves.

Who checks a quote

Medicaid managed care rates are certified as actuarially sound by an actuary. An employer quote usually isn't.

Insurers do file small group rates with state regulators, with an actuary's certification behind them. But that certification covers the insurer's rate filing, not the specific quote your group receives. Self-funded and level-funded funding rates generally aren't certified to anyone. So the checking falls to the employer and its broker.

A sound quote makes that easy. It shows its work: the trend assumed, the data behind it, and the margin for a bad year.

Common misunderstandings

01
"The cheaper quote is the unsound one."
Not necessarily. A lower quote can be sound if it reflects real savings, like better network discounts or lower fees. The question is what it assumes, not what it costs.
02
"A margin is just profit."
A margin for a bad year covers claims running higher than expected. In a self-funded or level-funded plan, an unused margin can come back to the employer as surplus.
03
"Actuarially sound means certified."
Only where a rule requires it, as in Medicaid managed care. Most employer quotes carry no actuarial certification.
04
"If we save this year, we're ahead."
Only if claims come in below what the cheaper quote assumed. If they run as expected, the next renewal takes back the savings and more.

Questions to ask your broker

  1. What trend does this quote assume, and over what period?
  2. Is there room for a bad year, and who pays if claims run over?
  3. If claims come in as expected, what's next year's increase?
  4. Why is the cheaper quote cheaper: assumptions, discounts or fees?